From news-central.tiac.net!news-in.tiac.net!news-in3.tiac.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-5.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-hub.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!howland.erols.net!feed1.news.erols.com!news.enteract.com!ix.netcom.com!news Sun Dec 1 20:04:34 1996 Path: news-central.tiac.net!news-in.tiac.net!news-in3.tiac.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-5.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-hub.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!howland.erols.net!feed1.news.erols.com!news.enteract.com!ix.netcom.com!news From: wilhelp@ix.netcom.com (Bill Palmer) Newsgroups: alt.internet.services,alt.usenet.kooks,tiac,news.admin.censorship,alt.uunet.anti-trust,alt.culture.usenet,alt.god.grubor,news.admin.policy Subject: Re: Net Libel: Where Are the Limits? Date: 1 Dec 1996 21:07:41 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 57 Message-ID: <57ss2t$316@sjx-ixn7.ix.netcom.com> References: <57nk4e$lcp@news-central.tiac.net> <32A02AF9.6921@earthlink.net> <57pi5o$qk0@news-central.tiac.net> <57qav1$i6@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <57s5t8$dja@zip1.zipnet.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lax-ca8-18.ix.netcom.com X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Dec 01 1:07:41 PM PST 1996 Xref: news-central.tiac.net alt.internet.services:16832 alt.usenet.kooks:19571 tiac:9025 news.admin.censorship:17421 alt.culture.usenet:10901 news.admin.policy:14132 In smisch@tiac.not (samson.fischkind) writes: > >In article <57s5t8$dja@zip1.zipnet.net>, boursy@ziplink.net (Stephen >Boursy) wrote: > >Stephen Boursy (boursy@earthlink.net) wrote: >> >> Readers might note that Roger is a 'Customer Service Rep.' >> for TIAC--a provider well known for not having Customer Service. >> He is quite characteristic of the overall quality of their >> service. > >Readers might also note that Steve Boursy has never dealt with Roger >Williams in the latter's capacity as a CS rep. I know nothing of Roger as >a person, but as a CS Rep, he has always impressed by his competence and >candor. As one of Cockroach Roger William's libel victims, I would like to add a comment or two. Perhaps to you, "candor," means Williams appalling habit of interrupting one of his own ignorant and self-serving "lectures" with perverted "asides" that often include addressing male persons as "bitch" in subhuman sewer argot, or drooling fantasies about bestiality and forcible sodomy, a la pervert John "Woof" Davis and perhaps the typical inmate of an asylum for the criminally and sexually disturbed. Frankly, if that is "candor," I wish Roach Rog would be a little less "candid" about his revolting personal obsessions and preoccupations. Now, I also have a humble comment on the "competence" of Cockroach Roger Williams. It seems to me that he IS in fact quite competent indeed. As a victim of the massive ".sig libel" scheme by which Roach Roger and few other "competent individuals" are trying to--in effect--steal my identity and replace it in the minds of thousands of readers with a "racist Mark Fuhrman monster" (that they themselves fabricated by misrepresenting less than a half-dozen non-racist words of the maybe non-racist 1.2 million words I have posted) I know what I'm talking about. Further, when I consider how fast that vicious campaign has grown-- nourished by the "competent," malicious and injurious actions of one Roger Williams--I can assure you the man, as a libel artist, is "competent" to a terrifying degree. copyright FLAME GIANT "On Wordscreens of the World" > >