From news-central.tiac.net!news-in.tiac.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!204.71.1.48!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.erols.net!ais.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!news-master!news Wed Dec 11 03:41:07 1996 Path: news-central.tiac.net!news-in.tiac.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!204.71.1.48!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.erols.net!ais.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!news-master!news From: drgrubor@aol.com (Doctor Grubor) Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.usenet.kooks,news.admin.censorship,alt.culture.usenet,tiac,ne.internet.services,alt.god.grubor Subject: Re: Where's Our Dishonest Cockroach Crawling Now? Date: Sun, 08 Dec 1996 12:18:42 GMT Organization: Law Systems Institute Lines: 145 Message-ID: <58efbq$ao2@herald.concentric.net> References: <589c5b$ma3@sjx-ixn2.ix.netcom.com> <589i2h$2dh@news-central.tiac.net> <58a78o$cfb@sjx-ixn10.ix.netcom.com> <32AA82FC.12B8@earthlink.net> Reply-To: lsi@pgh.org NNTP-Posting-Host: cnc077046.concentric.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news-central.tiac.net alt.flame:79123 alt.usenet.kooks:20345 news.admin.censorship:17953 alt.culture.usenet:11218 tiac:9279 ne.internet.services:7686 Stephen Boursy wrote: >Bill Palmer wrote: >> >> rogerw@tiac.net (Roger Williams) writes: >> >> This is the second in my serial response to >> Cockroach Roger Williams' latest spew under >> this distinguished newsgroup line. As most >> readers know, I'm working to keep my posts >> shorter. Last time, I remarked on the >> interesting idea of singed and libelous Roger >> citing a list of his fellow flame war losers >> and libelists as his "character witnesses." >>> > Calm down Bill. Roger is a 'Customer Service Rep' >at TIAC--just imagine how embarrassing that is to >live with--cut the bastard a little slack. > Steve >> >> >: In "Cockroach Crosses Finish Line" thief Roger Williams >> >: included an incredible number of sleazy lies and >> >: allegations. Some of of them I responded to well >> >: enough in my immediate follow-up post, but I couldn't >> >: respond to everything in depth without creating an >> >: article that was far too long for my readers. Some of >> >: Roger's lies and insinuations will need a bit more comment >> >: in a series of future posts. >> > Yes, you do a nice job of "ripping him a new asshole," Bill. Keep up the good work. >> >: Roger Williams has already proved himself a libel artist, >> >: a racist, and a thief. Clearly, he has extended his libel >> > >> > Where is this "proven", Palmjob? >> >> Of course, sewer-bred cockroach Williams continues >> to insult all Palmers. Racist Williams also keeps >> insisting that his slurs consisting of [adjective >> for skin color] + "trash" are not racist and >> offensive. I have already cited plenty of good >> reasons why the are to so many people around the >> world. Racist Roger completely ignored those, and >> went on denying his vile racism--while continue to >> run a monstrous .sig libel campaign based on a devious >> misrepresentation of a non-racist satirical snippet >> consisting of less than 0.000001 percent of my posted >> words! Even though this racist cockroach, Roger >> Williams, now boasts of a website to factitiously >> "support" his defamations, he continues to spout >> racist slurs. >> >> Further proof of Cockroach Williams utter ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ NICE title! >> lack of integrity is found in the fact that >> he uses a TYPO (variety: careless word >> omission) to prop up his libels. Even though >> I have denied his baseless slurs over one >> hundred times, he thinks a typo of word omission >> will give his transparent defamation more "clout." >> That of course is because Roger Williams is fully >> as stupid as he is dishonest and libelous. >> [Typo corrected, below. What is especially >> ironic here is that Cockroach Williams is >> known to actually misspell quite a few words >> himself.] >> >> "I have NEVER used a 'racial' or ethnic insult >> against anyone in my over one-million posted words." >> >> >Dang. Looks like an out and out admission >> >to me! >> >> I wouldn't say that, Cockroch Roger. Or do >> you deny I have the right to correct my >> own word-omission typo--when YOU yourself >> misspell so many words? >> >> It only looks that way because you are >> dishonest enough to ignore my over one-hundred >> posted responses of denial to your ".sig libel," >> Cockroach Roger. You certainly show how >> desperate and devious you are when you jump >> on a careless word omission to support >> you malicious and injurious ".sig libel." >> >> [...] >> >> [Cockroach Williams goes on to give "reference" >> information as to where he got his word-omission >> typo. The idiot would probably want me to repost >> my one-hundred plus denials and "headers" to rebut >> his tranaprent ploy. Next he quotes another snippet >> of mine. This is truly astonishing! The guttersnipe >> must think I'm ashamed of it. Roger quotes me: >> >> "I've never posted any insult to any ethnic group-- >> but I'm not going to let the politically correct >> 'thought police' buffalo me into a situation where >> I fear my every fifth word might be twisted out of >> context to misrepresent my point of view; you know, >> sort of like if I say "paddy wagon," someone wails >> that I'm disrespecting Irishfolks." >> >> Roger's reference spew deleted. It was there >> only to support his sleazy insinuation that I >> should be ashamed of my openness. As to my >> comment, I said it. I meant it. I stand by it >> one-hundred percent as being fully true and correct. >> It is the frank reaction of a writer to having an >> infinitesimal percentage of his satrical words snipped >> and viciously misrepresented. Well, I'll conclude my >> response to the ".sig libel support" portion of Cockroach >> Williams latest defamatory spew. How interesting that >> our libel artist Williams is so stupidly confident of >> his criminal endravor as to think that a fully >> correct statement of mine (just above) and a >> TYPO will bolster his dishonest "case." >> >> More in a later response, as I continue to >> strive to keep my "shorter posts" promise to >> the readers. Again, I have never meant anyone >> capable of packing so many lies and libels into >> one line as dishonest Cockroach Willliams. >> If I stayed with one post to refute his 11k, >> I would be up in the 30k area. Not the best >> way to keep readers reading, I must say... >> >> copyright FLAME GIANT >> >> "On Wordscreens of the World" >> > You need to do this with audio on the Net, Bill. Teh you can scream at the cockroach.