From news-central.tiac.net!news-in.tiac.net!posterchild!news@tiac.net Sun Dec 1 20:03:18 1996 Path: news-central.tiac.net!news-in.tiac.net!posterchild!news@tiac.net From: timj@tiac.net (Timothy W. Jackson) Newsgroups: alt.internet.services,alt.usenet.kooks,tiac,news.admin.censorship,alt.uunet.anti-trust,alt.culture.usenet,alt.god.grubor,news.admin.policy Subject: Re: Net Libel: Where Are the Limits? Date: Sun, 01 Dec 1996 23:18:08 GMT Organization: The Internet Access Company, Inc. Lines: 70 Message-ID: <57t3nq$4hv@news-central.tiac.net> References: <57nk4e$lcp@news-central.tiac.net> <32A02AF9.6921@earthlink.net> <57pi5o$qk0@news-central.tiac.net> <57qav1$i6@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <57s5t8$dja@zip1.zipnet.net> <57ss2t$316@sjx-ixn7.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: barney.tiac.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: news-central.tiac.net alt.internet.services:16843 alt.usenet.kooks:19585 tiac:9030 news.admin.censorship:17435 alt.culture.usenet:10909 news.admin.policy:14133 wilhelp@ix.netcom.com (Bill Palmer) wrote: >In smisch@tiac.not >(samson.fischkind) writes: >> >>In article <57s5t8$dja@zip1.zipnet.net>, boursy@ziplink.net (Stephen >>Boursy) wrote: >> >>Stephen Boursy (boursy@earthlink.net) wrote: >>> >>> Readers might note that Roger is a 'Customer Service Rep.' >>> for TIAC--a provider well known for not having Customer Service. >>> He is quite characteristic of the overall quality of their >>> service. >> >>Readers might also note that Steve Boursy has never dealt with Roger >>Williams in the latter's capacity as a CS rep. I know nothing of Roger >as >>a person, but as a CS Rep, he has always impressed by his competence >and >>candor. >As one of Cockroach Roger William's libel victims, >I would like to add a comment or two. Perhaps to >you, "candor," means Williams appalling habit of >interrupting one of his own ignorant and self-serving >"lectures" with perverted "asides" that often include >addressing male persons as "bitch" in subhuman sewer >argot, or drooling fantasies about bestiality and >forcible sodomy, a la pervert John "Woof" Davis and >perhaps the typical inmate of an asylum for the >criminally and sexually disturbed. Frankly, if >that is "candor," I wish Roach Rog would be a little >less "candid" about his revolting personal obsessions >and preoccupations. >Now, I also have a humble comment on the "competence" >of Cockroach Roger Williams. It seems to me that >he IS in fact quite competent indeed. As a victim >of the massive ".sig libel" scheme by which Roach >Roger and few other "competent individuals" are >trying to--in effect--steal my identity and >replace it in the minds of thousands of readers >with a "racist Mark Fuhrman monster" (that they >themselves fabricated by misrepresenting less >than a half-dozen non-racist words of the maybe >non-racist 1.2 million words I have posted) I >know what I'm talking about. Further, when I >consider how fast that vicious campaign has grown-- >nourished by the "competent," malicious and injurious >actions of one Roger Williams--I can assure you the >man, as a libel artist, is "competent" to a terrifying >degree. >copyright FLAME GIANT > "On Wordscreens of the World" >> >> Where the hell did you come from? You might want to try a little lubricant next time, it might be a little easier. I have read Rogers comments and I have never come away with an idea that Roger is perverse. You, on the other hand, come across as a sexual zealot as my first impression. You also babble on about shit that nobody can understand. Come back around once you get your GED and lets see if you can put together a coherent paragraph. Tim